From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,429176cb92b1b825 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AWS Coding Styles (and about boring plain-linear text files in the end) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:28:29 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <24418fa4-8843-4fe6-8c2f-026ea6009b68@g26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <87lj2ido9j.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <4D35F6C8.2060100@obry.net> <4d3608ab$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d3634a5$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d36b748$0$6977$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4d36e484$0$6769$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: nCoynSItJacK8nNC7nzOHA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19221 Date: 2011-03-16T19:28:29+01:00 List-Id: Le Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:17:56 +0100, Georg Bauhaus = a =C3=A9crit: > On 19.01.11 12:42, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) wrote: > >> According to the authoritative FunnelWeb documentation, which you can= = >> access >> here: >> http://www.ross.net/funnelweb/tutorial/intro_hello.html >> the body of a macros, whose purpose is to expand into program text, i= s = >> exactly >> the same as the one you suggested! > > No, no, the brackets @{ @}, or the line-of-code indicator @@ are much > simpler than FunnelWeb. For one thing, the Ada programmer only needs > to understand Ada and will not think about typesetting or macros or > line endings. > Still in this area of annotations and rich documenting, I found another = = more or less standard which could be of interest : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epydoc http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/ http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/manual-fields.html Wikipedia says > Epydoc is a documentation generator that processes its own lightweight= > markup language Epytext for Python documentation strings. As opposed t= o > freeform Python docstrings, reStructured Text (both also supported) an= d > other markup languages for docstrings, Epytext supports linking betwee= n > different pieces of documentation. What I particularly enjoy here, is the part =E2=80=9Csupports linking be= tween = different pieces of documentation=E2=80=9D. While there are multiple standards covering similar things (I would like= = one single standard, not many), there is at least one aspect which seems= = there all the time : the meaning of =E2=80=9C@=E2=80=9D as introducing a= nnotations. You = got it in Java, C, Python, FunnelWeb, among others. That's widely used = enough. At least a step to something standard=E2=80=A6 (I still miss man= y and many = things). -- = Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es= t pas pour = les chiens. =E2=80=9CI am fluent in ASCII=E2=80=9D [Warren 2010]