From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7ba3a3c7efe3bd X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe15.iad.POSTED!2941a808!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: "Martin Krischik" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Win32) X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:26:59 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:26:58 +0100 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19127 Date: 2011-03-14T08:26:58+01:00 List-Id: Am 14.03.2011, 00:16 Uhr, schrieb Randy Brukardt := > I did, so it is of course true that portability is less important. But= = > why > use lousy Ada design in any Ada code? The only thing I can think of is= = > that > it was designed for Ada 83 -- but that doesn't make much sense for GNA= T > code. Indeed it does not. And there is quite a lot of strange stuff going on i= n = the GNAT compiler. Anyway it compiler it I remove the -m64 option. So I guess it is a probl= em = in handling x86_64 code. Which in turn means I will =E2=80=9Conly=E2=80=9D= be able to = create a 32 bit compiler. Ahh well, better then nothing. Martin -- Martin Krischik mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net https://sourceforge.net/users/krischik