From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e3f191debc78584 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Can Ada be hacked? Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:55:42 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <215154cd-f0bf-4138-b294-776d4e058592@o30g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <2561745b-7720-470d-a6ee-67f1d0e8cff0@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 6kCddbWv9d4Z+xMli6Bqlw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17943 Date: 2011-03-07T14:55:42+01:00 List-Id: Le Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:57:57 +0100, Peter C. Chapin = a =C3=A9crit: > Of course the first step in > creating such a browser would probably be to ban plugins and maybe eve= n = > to > ban JavaScript. Many page requires user interaction, so a kind of programmatic is requir= ed = to animate any HTML version. And as George said in this thread, browsers= = now looks like a platform on their own, and this platform sometime = requires its applications, which are the plugins (mainly to play medias)= . = You could do many worthy browsing with a pure HTML browser, like going t= o = AdaIC for some news (:-)), but sooner or later you will go frustrated. Make all of that safe, would be a great challenge for software engineerS= , = which would go beyond the single topic of web-browser. > One could perhaps implement a JavaScript with extra run time checking = at = > the > JavaScript language level. I really don't know. Of course it would run= = > more > slowly. There was no security hole due to the lack of typing, the only impact of= = that are stupid and exhausting errors only discovered at runtime (you = really need to be the original author to update a real JS application). = = There is already a planed typed successor for JS (optional type = annotations and type inference, was planned before, then dropped, then = re-introduced as a target, and this is supposed to be part of the next = ECMA standard revision). -- = Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es= t pas pour = les chiens. =E2=80=9CI am fluent in ASCII=E2=80=9D [Warren 2010]