From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_LOCAL_HEX,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1295f20108acc30c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776eeb@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Directories.Copy_File behavior
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 01:31:15 +0100
Message-ID: <op.vq6eedrrlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <op.vq598idwlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <ijplkd$pqj$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 8d6BZn7bP/Fc2nZFVfsQQQXeak4X7pMlVEYtjexX2WmNtpFCPv
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LTrM1vs1Oh3+hBMcWnj3AFXEmQk=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.01 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18437
Date: 2011-02-20T01:31:15+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

  wrote:

>> So, the actual behaviour depends on the underlying OS, I'd say.
> The Windows CopyFile function takes a BOOL parameter bFailIfExists,
> so is it implementation-defined what Ada.Directories.Copy_File does?

I'm afraid so.


Vinzent.