From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,429176cb92b1b825
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AWS Coding Styles (and about boring plain-linear text files in
 the end)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:54:31 +0100
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vpob85ipule2fv@garhos>
References: <op.vpfsjkfdule2fv@garhos>
 <3077fffa-eed7-4763-8bca-9ac3bb0a41e1@o14g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <82y66ihc0i.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <4d355532$0$6878$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <8b58b9da-a014-4a0e-8d20-ca86a4993961@h17g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vpix8wlkule2fv@garhos> <ih63aj$tvj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <opclukh52cb7$.20ypr8aj468$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ih6pia$3m1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <op.vpkr4pufule2fv@garhos>
 <0-OdndPHNIoLRqTQnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: si1wcqmfPAlDmjwCD+0L/g.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.00 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16617
Date: 2011-01-21T20:54:31+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:17:07 +0100, Robert Matthews  =

<ignore@ramatthews.free-online.co.uk> a =C3=A9crit:

> Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) wrote:
>
>>
>> That's precisely why source-review is better made by some-one else th=
an  =

>> by
>> your-self. Fortunately, if you really need to do it your self (if you=
  =

>> are
>> single in a project), you still have an option: wait for some time, s=
ome
>> weeks or preferably some months (without coming back to that source),=
 to
>> review your self (you will read it with different eyes).
>
> I find a next-day review very effective.
>
> Bob Matthews
At least, after some minimal distance (or else one will always read it t=
he  =

same, so always see the same, and always be blind to the same).


-- =

Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es=
t pas pour  =

les chiens.

=E2=80=9CI am fluent in ASCII=E2=80=9D [Warren 2010]