From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,429176cb92b1b825
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AWS Coding Styles (and about boring plain-linear text files in
 the end)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:10:09 +0100
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vphp27d1ule2fv@garhos>
References: <op.vpfsjkfdule2fv@garhos>
 <3077fffa-eed7-4763-8bca-9ac3bb0a41e1@o14g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: IbwjOtp6CRWK4RAOHu6GbA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.00 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16503
Date: 2011-01-18T07:10:09+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:58:31 +0100, Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> a  =

=C3=A9crit:

> On Jan 16, 9:07 pm, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57)
> <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
>> In =E2=80=9C8 Packages and Visibility Rules=E2=80=9D :
>>
>>     > Do not with two times the same unit, always use the
>>     > deepest child unit to with. For example do not write:
>>     >            with Ada.Strings;
>>     >            with Ada.Strings.Unbounded;
>>     > but the equivalent form:
>>                  with Ada.Strings.Unbounded;
>>
>>     I always do the opposite. I feel it is clearer if I
>>     refer to the parent unit. If I don't, I do not withed
>>     the parent unit (i.e. I state something about usage in
>>     the withed declarations).
>
> My preference is to say "with Ada.Strings;", even if I am also
> with'ing Ada.Strings.Unbounded, if (and only if) I am referring to
> something actually declared in Ada.Strings (such as
> Ada.Strings.Direction).  I think that makes things clearer.  I can't
> really imagine why anyone would think it's a bad idea to say "with
> Ada.Strings;" in that case.
That is indeed what I was trying to explain.

-- =

Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es=
t pas pour  =

les chiens.

=E2=80=9CI am fluent in ASCII=E2=80=9D [Warren 2010]