From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8e7ac81a215f128c X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using Red-Black Trees Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:38:25 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <2419e829-6f45-4075-9005-b9876beb8aaa@r6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: w00cPq0BvzOlRCSRJJEoeQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16529 Date: 2010-11-17T23:38:25+01:00 List-Id: Le Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:46:16 +0100, Randy Brukardt = a =C3=A9crit: > It's not explicit. One of the possible implementations of the ordered = = > sets > and maps is to use a Red-Black tree; presumably this is what GNAT's > implementation is doing. And there are even other ways to get a balanced tree, which are not = red-black-trees (I use something else for long, which do a kind of layou= t = analysis, this work nice). -- = Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es= t pas pour = les chiens. =E2=80=9CI am fluent in ASCII=E2=80=9D [Warren 2010]