From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,168309ad531202b6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNATBench : how can I install ? Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:33:24 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <1717f132-4cc1-43ec-89a8-69d40a12d65d@m24g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <915ba2dc-07d6-43d4-980e-448101d358e4@v12g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: NQGlFqe1mD/2jNzCmrBjDw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15255 Date: 2010-11-05T12:33:24+01:00 List-Id: Le Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:22:54 +0100, Britt Snodgrass = a =C3=A9crit: > I much prefer to edit GPR files manually with the GNATbench text > editor because its easier to keep the GPR files neat, commented, and > optimally structured. The project file editing GUI works but it can > restructure the GPR file in ugly ways when it saves the file. It will= > often introduce unneeded case statements in every GPR package when the= > project uses scenario variables. So I only use the project editor GUI= > to help discover compiler and tool switches, then I close the GUI > without saving and proceed to edit the file manually. Right. This is even more difficult if you introduce a real logic, then G= PS = will may not be able to read it anymore (do not remember exactly, there = = was some constants defined if my mind is right). While there are at least two advantageous point with the Rich Editor = approach : you do not have to check the manual all the time to see what = is = that one letter or two letter flag you forget about (but if you leave = comments, the Rich Editor will remove them all). And the second point, f= or = a first approach, new comers, a Rich Editor is better. -- = Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es= t pas pour = les chiens.