From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e276c1ed16429c03
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada is getting more popular!
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:27:23 +0100
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.vlmgzxh8ule2fv@garhos>
References: <i93mac$73v$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <bbe0c03c-6afd-40de-bf9e-04aa04b53504@n7g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vk3myjmvule2fv@garhos>
 <4cc4cb65$0$6985$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <ts1f314b5d8n.1863myx2cjkzn$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5086cc5e-cd51-4222-a977-06bdb4fb3430@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <14fkqzngmbae6.zhgzct559yc.dlg@40tude.net>
 <8732ea65-1c69-4160-9792-698c5a2e8615@g13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vk5bdvuuule2fv@garhos> <4cc60705$0$23764$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <op.vk5njxfwule2fv@garhos> <4cc6753c$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1010261417580.19777@Bluewhite64.example.net>
 <l7zc23dm3aoa.iau7vplf75op$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1010271135480.20224@Bluewhite64.example.net>
 <52gg2kvo94mp$.1kbk6tiqzwnra$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011031731350.20621@Bluewhite64.example.net>
 <e45g6x97t6iz.149qztlu1bwba$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4vQNEkQz8jPZLol/IaLwBQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16165
Date: 2010-11-04T02:27:23+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:52:43 +0100, Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-ka=
zakov.de> a =C3=A9crit:
>> I would prefer a dedicated Ada programmer who is so interested in the=

>> topic that he or she gets much more done than the lazy Ada programmer=
,
>> whose interest instead seems to be going to the beach.
>
> No programmer can work *productively* for more than 4 hours per day.
Depends on the work, how it is done. If what is considered work is only
the time spend to write, then, OK. if time to read, to study, to talk
about the topic is also work, then I think any one can go easily beyond
four hours. Doing less job in more time seems a good option too. Kicking=

people with the hope they will do more in less time (and pay them less b=
y
the way), shown for long what the result is : bad job, furious clients
(but happy investors who earn a lot selling bad products, =E2=80=A6 more=
 products).

-- =

Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es=
t pas pour les chiens.