From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e276c1ed16429c03 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.68.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!94.75.214.39.MISMATCH!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada is getting more popular! Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:51:29 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <4cc60705$0$23764$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc6753c$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc71e08$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc87d7a$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc912e1$0$23761$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <19rlit851kct1$.db26uwez2yg7$.dlg@40tude.net> <4cc94547$0$23752$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc9bf12$0$23765$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <15lnc6vv8z3hc$.1oi6i03umest8$.dlg@40tude.net> <871v7aqcpq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <13rgisoyxwkb2$.1dpflsd9zyiz5.dlg@40tude.net> <4cca091e$0$7655$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4h6j3lfp7x5l.zqrg45o56ci3$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: MBnfDkYuJKoIyXbkYutszA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:15906 Date: 2010-10-29T18:51:29+02:00 List-Id: Le Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:00:37 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov = a =C3=A9crit: >> + + >> + + + + >> + + >> Public Open Standards ! >> + + >> + + + + >> + + > > No, FREE standards! I find it unacceptable when organizations charge = > money > for standards. If the standard is widely used, even when it is for too much fees (for = someones), there are still workarounds with none-official documentations= . = Look at ASIS specification or the MIDI specification. But true someones = = are more restrictive and may requires you close any web page documenting= = the standard (it use to be with one hardware standard, I forget the name= , = something near to PCI or USB, but not these). >> Standard protocols, standard languages, standard file formats: >> if these are enforced in a market, they prevent entrepreneurial >> attempts at controlling the customers. > > Yes, they became a vehicle for unfair competition, because the softwar= e > market was destroyed. That does not imply standards are evil. The = > monopoly > is. Does not solve anything, but not responsible for that (I see what you = mean). Some standard are as much unavoidable as natural languages. Probably yes= , = this ones are expected to be accessible; in practice, I believe these ar= e. = Do not see a real trouble there (unless someones witness opposite = experiences). -- = Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=E2=80=99es= t pas pour = les chiens.