From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e276c1ed16429c03
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <nntp-2010-10@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada is getting more popular!
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:45:35 +0200
Message-ID: <op.vkkw19ro0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <i93mac$73v$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <bbe0c03c-6afd-40de-bf9e-04aa04b53504@n7g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
 <i94sak$47q$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <020ea727-e8e9-4d0d-8c5f-b8ad907fc3c9@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vkjcy2vv0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <8edaf552-0104-4150-bb55-5557e8e24be3@i5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vkjefkhi0k3wt7@jellix.jlfencey.com> <m2hbgp4ber.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net LZTPZ7uROWXJz5nH617N8gHeInAdFKadyD4sBZkz7JiCWIYqbe
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1jeogBiftzL7bERyTUsxDYVuaBQ=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:15507
Date: 2010-10-14T20:45:35+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:59:40 +0200, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote:

> "Vinzent Hoefler" <nntp-2010-10@t-domaingrabbing.de> writes:
>
>> In that case you lose, because you cannot create A without explicit
>> bounds. And with explicit bounds, the x.A'Access won't do.
>
> But, as OP noted, you can use GNAT's 'Unrestricted_Access.

Which is want I meant with "you lose" (compiler independence).


Vinzent.

-- 
There is no signature.