From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4ce5890331a5b529 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Vinzent Hoefler" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Discriminants of tagged types Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:35:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <14314714-e92c-4036-9cbb-da8e72489261@h7g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Trace: individual.net RhOREmadoPrbyDBFqI/e8Q/JV3VfowMxSh9Cn93yRiuEuXw+qf Cancel-Lock: sha1:CVkF1NtS2BeiXBUK1+EJrowO338= User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14847 Date: 2010-10-27T18:35:14+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:58:06 +0200, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) wrote: > A question then come : do someone know something to which default > discriminants are unavoidable ? I feel default discriminants can simpl= y be > dropped (kind of sugar?), but I would like to be sure. Well, we heavily use types with default discriminants in the project, but if the feature wasn't available, I am sure, other solutions would come up. So I wouldn't count that as "unavoidable". Vinzent. -- = There is no signature.