From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,595c75298fbdce96
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is Aunit helpful?
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:20:41 +0200
Organization: Ada At Home
Message-ID: <op.vhqb8rxmxmjfy8@garhos>
References: 
 <8a1e58c0-2330-4475-8013-97df103dd85e@o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <82r5ids1o9.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <daea94be-eb3a-4984-a6de-0b68225e3139@o19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <20100805211820.52c18cb5.tero.koskinen@iki.fi>
 <8d166cfb-4850-42b6-ac25-d9ac00df7565@q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vhdx2hsoule2fv@garhos> <82ocd5wukf.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <3957496a-af4b-45f5-87c9-327b22d19f08@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
 <82eie0vzyd.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <32dc1191-0a83-40ef-8bbc-a13a06f2167e@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vhh4slqeule2fv@garhos> <i4ct62$ahf$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: OqdZOHVYLgcL4k6eJUKLaA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13531
Date: 2010-08-20T11:20:41+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:46:23 +0200, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com=
>  =

a =E9crit:
> better job. That is, well-written preconditions and postconditions can=
 be
> statically proved. (The Ada 2012 language won't require that, because =
its
> beyond the state-of-the-art today to be able to decide which ones can =
be
> proved and which ones cannot. But I hope that we can do better in the
> future.)
>
> Pre and Post hopefully will provide a foundation where compilers will =
 =

> make
> at least some of these checks statically.
>
>                            Randy.

May be yes, I have underestimated this technique.

I agree with your prospective view