From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a34b7ad6c6a0774 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Efficiency of code generated by Ada compilers Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:58:06 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: YYagVKn1YrNkilfPXbyxag.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.60 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13284 Date: 2010-08-14T15:58:06+02:00 List-Id: Le Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:47:27 +0200, Brian Drummond = a =E9crit: > In a single cycle, one small corner of the Rekursiv would perform both= = > range > checks and type checks, Range check... and type check. Just real vs integer or was their some ki= nd = of typing in integers as well ? Also may be character, BCD and the like = ? > The entire Rekursiv was > about 70k gates + memory, next to a contemporary RISC of around 20-30k= . 70 000 gates, that's light. > There was much talk then of "bridging the semantic gap" between high = > level > languages and the low level operations in hardware. Yes. This matter seems gone now, or else nobody care any more or else = nobody believe in it any more. Thanks for all of your testimony/account, was very interesting :) -- = There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; --# assert Ada; -- i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion -- and start with new conclusion as premise.