From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bf1c4b845bd2160 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What about a glob standard method in Ada.Command_Line ? Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:29:10 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <4c7516f7$0$7664$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: H0Ci3WDhdyTdURnA0sNEyw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13740 Date: 2010-08-25T22:29:10+02:00 List-Id: Le Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:28:09 +0200, J-P. Rosen a =E9cr= it: > But maybe anon is confusing the ARG with the ARA? The ARA (Ada Ressour= ce > Association) is a groupment of vendors, there is a fee to join, but th= e > ARA has no power on the evolution of the language. I remember that name, ARA. I meet it when I was reading documents to = understand the validation process. Feel to remember the ARA was involved= = in some manner in this (compiler validation). Found back a page about it: http://www.adaic.org/compilers/articles/acaa_org.html -- = * 3 lines of concise statements is readable, 10 pages of concise = statements is unreadable ; * 3 lines of verbose statements may looks unuseful, 10 pages of verbose = = statements will never looks too much pedantic