From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,486d4972706e99db X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bug rate and choice of programming language Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:04:57 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: <9b242840-3400-4d5c-aa1e-db238701aebe@l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <3e1c5adb-a0b8-4ffd-9268-fcaa2e3ad13c@v15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anOtUalzMUZHasssFqT+2w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.60 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13099 Date: 2010-08-11T02:04:57+02:00 List-Id: Le Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:53:25 +0200, Phil Thornley = a =C3=A9crit: > http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2003/11/0311german.html Would like to quote this from the latter link: > The application of static code analysis techniques in retrospect > is not ideal; the process is best suited and cheapest when applied > during software development. Not in retrospect, but during the process (implies from near the start).= -- = There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; --# assert Ada; -- i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion -- and start with new conclusion as premise.