From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a34b7ad6c6a0774 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Efficiency of code generated by Ada compilers Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:14:02 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: <8349c981-4dca-49dc-9189-8ea726234de3@f42g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anOtUalzMUZHasssFqT+2w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.60 (Win32) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13072 Date: 2010-08-10T17:14:02+02:00 List-Id: Le Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:01:10 +0200, Robert A Duff = a =E9crit: > No, Ada generics work the same way as C++ templates -- the typical > implementation is that each instance gets a separate copy of > the code I wonder If I've understood you correctly. It seems Ada use code sharing= = (which is the reason of some restriction on formal parameters). Code = duplication is the C++'s template way, not the Ada's generic package way= . = Or am I mistaken somewhere ?