From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 8d3408f8c3,9bdec20bcc7f3687
X-Google-Attributes: gid8d3408f8c3,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!192.87.166.28.MISMATCH!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!193.190.198.58.MISMATCH!aotearoa.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.net.uni-c.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1
Subject: Re: Why is Ada considered "too specialized" for scientific use
References: <hp95j8$i29$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <4bb9c72c$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <pan.2010.04.05.20.51.46.20000@none.net>
 <4bba8bf1$0$56418$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4bbb2246$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <4bbb5386$0$56422$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <m2tyrnjc5f.fsf@pushface.org> <4bbdf5c6$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <f5a9304e-e6eb-40b2-8944-a6ca4bc92b1b@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
 <4c0a2e36$0$34205$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net>
 <4c0b234f$1$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
 <hugevn02qfb@news5.newsguy.com> <op.vdv17504z25lew@macpro-eth1.krischik.com>
 <hugt0702ccl@news2.newsguy.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:02:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Martin Krischik" <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Organization: Martin Krischik, Softwareentwicklung
Message-ID: <op.vdw1qdooz25lew@macpro-eth1.krischik.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (MacIntel)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.236.175.138
X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk
 DXC=LCVAB^>NdQ]5dE91CT5^XYYSB=nbEKnk[Lk>VcI2_6Z]IDiY_4:UK?Sd3N<Hj?FVI^>ai^>E:QM5T2e^5VLiC>9VCNmW[M2\BH^
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11386 comp.lang.fortran:24116
 comp.lang.pl1:1391
Date: 2010-06-07T08:02:27+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am 06.06.2010, 21:12 Uhr, schrieb J. Clarke <jclarke.usenet@cox.net>:

> On 6/6/2010 1:15 PM, Martin Krischik wrote:
>> Am 06.06.2010, 17:19 Uhr, schrieb J. Clarke <jclarke.usenet@cox.net>:
>>
>>> On 6/6/2010 12:25 AM, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
>>
>>> What do you believe to be the difference between machine code and
>>> assembler?
>>
>> 6502 Assembler:
>>
>> LDA #10
>>
>> 6502 Machine code:
>>
>> A9 10
>>
>> Any more silly questions?
>
> Does LDA #10 assemble to any _other_ code than A9 10?

No.

> Is there any _other_ code that assembles to A9 10?

Yes:

	.BYTE $A9, $10

or:

Ten:	.EQ  $10
	LDA #Ten

Did you all forget that assemblers support symbolic names, various pseudo  
codes and sometimes macros? That was the really useful part.

Martin

-- 
Martin Krischik
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
https://sourceforge.net/users/krischik