From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d4e6b104ff087788 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPARK : surprising failure with implication Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:56:23 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: <1w1eqf61t3v92$.lh19ptdumc7y$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: FWfoAwrKC5rz12vcTu3tlw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12189 Date: 2010-06-02T09:56:23+02:00 List-Id: Le Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:42:58 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov = a =E9crit: > (forall A,B in Boolean) > > not B =3D> not A =3D > =3D not not B or not A =3D > =3D B or not A =3D > =3D not A or B =3D > =3D A =3D> B > Yes, you confirmed that is right and so I'm not silly. But why Simplifie= r = do not seems to know it ? It is the basis of inference logic. That is wh= y = I have such a weighty question in my mind : I wonder if I did something = = wrong somewhere or if something is broken. Do you have an idea ? -- = There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; --# assert Ada; -- i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion -- and start with new conclusion as premise.