From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,cb90b009d6b31cab
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!fdn.fr!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Spark, pragma
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:50:03 +0200
Organization: Ada At Home
Message-ID: <op.vden1ph0ule2fv@garhos>
References: 
 <7987b9a7-b5ad-4e09-af7e-92734e551c48@f13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: GzQnrNzaoPGtXNRJOLsqnw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12108
Date: 2010-05-28T09:50:03+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Fri, 28 May 2010 09:34:48 +0200, Alexandre K  =

<alexandre.nospam@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit:

> Hi,
> I am having trouble with Spark and pragma. If I am not wrong, Spark
> accepts all pragmas and generate warning when we run the examiner. In
> order than the examiner succeeds, we can tell in the warning control
> file that we want to accept some or all pragma, with "pragma all".
> Basically, I added a pragma Style_Checks ("-s", Off) in the beginning
> of the package body.
> When I run the examiner without warning control, it results a warning
> about this pragma and another as a consequence :
>
> Warning 430 - SLI generation abandoned owing to syntax or semantic
> errors or multiple units in a single source file.
>
> If run the examiner with the warning control, the warning message is
> resumed, but the warning
>
> Warning 430 - SLI generation abandoned owing to syntax or semantic
> errors or multiple units in a single source file.
>
> still exists and there is no other warning or error.
> I can't understand why.
>
> Any idea ?
> Thanks

Hi Alex,

I've just tried the same as you did, a =E2=80=9Cpragma Style_Checks ("-s=
", Off);=E2=80=9D  =

at the start of a package body, and could only get the classic warning, =
 =

not the one about SLI generation. Additionally, I could not find any  =

reference to a Warning 430 in the Examiner_UM documentation. Warning cod=
es  =

exposed there stop at Warning 420, no code beyond.

If this is not private stuff, can you post your body file here ?

Another mention required: SPARK GPL or SPARK Pro ? They may not be the  =

same... (I only have SPARK GPL in hands)

Cheers

-- =

There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.
--# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho;
--# assert Ada;
--  i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion
--  and start with new conclusion as premise.