From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c0de5a42cf667e
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:22:59 +0200
Organization: Ada At Home
Message-ID: <op.vdbbcldlxmjfy8@garhos>
References: <j5e1x31qvn1b$.11ywrjmshtauz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <t8liq7w6ffnm$.19yq5hkq6tdto$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vcgi9oqzule2fv@garhos>
 <w1q9e75h9kzi.4p81vh3kannn$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vch6dsqmxmjfy8@garhos>
 <16bz9kvbqa8y9$.155ntpwpwl29d.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4be97bea$0$2966$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <op.vcjtnsp5xmjfy8@garhos>
 <quqkqeas8pu2$.1w5pelct29juv.dlg@40tude.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005121017020.21749@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <1p87qdlnjbufg.127laayhrw9x3$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vclocqp9ule2fv@garhos>
 <4j73xhgimt6r$.pu55kne2p2w5$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vc93x5wlule2fv@garhos>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261013510.12488@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <op.vda8oshlule2fv@garhos>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261455260.26620@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2gba2B6ZhmveiNSbnmeIoQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11057
Date: 2010-05-26T14:22:59+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Wed, 26 May 2010 15:02:50 +0200, <stefan-lucks@see-the.signature> a  =

=E9crit:
> Annotations are an addition to the original language. Annotations are
> typically "hidden" in comments (from the viewpoint of the original
> language). This is in constrast to contracts defined as a part of the
> language itself. (Technically, the language with the annotations makes=
 a
> new language ... but there is a gap between the normal part of the
> language, and the comment-like annotations.
This is just notation, no one can infer anything from such a premise.

> I am a university teacher. For me, it makes quite a difference if I  =

> either
> explain studens one coherent language where contracts are an integral =
 =

> part
> of (like Eiffel), or one programming langugage plus an additional  =

> language
> for the annotations.
For perception, this matter, I agree.


-- =

There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.