From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa0ebfe6afda2b3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re:
 =?utf-8?B?U1BBUksgc3ludGF4IGFuZCDigJx1c2UgdHlwZeKAnSA6IGxhY2sgb2YgZmU=?=
 =?utf-8?B?YXR1cmUgPw==?=
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:28:32 +0200
Organization: Ada At Home
Message-ID: <op.vda51ujgxmjfy8@garhos>
References: <op.vc73ixt2ule2fv@garhos>
 <17c936fc-66ce-4bb9-ba5a-069d9ed5a2fe@l6g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vc912yr1ule2fv@garhos>
 <d6b90050-e5a7-4e7a-8e1e-62dde45c57de@d12g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
 <2b6614f5-9845-41cb-b68a-90c14a43b19e@c7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2gba2B6ZhmveiNSbnmeIoQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11052
Date: 2010-05-26T12:28:32+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Wed, 26 May 2010 09:38:49 +0200, Rod Chapman  =

<roderick.chapman@googlemail.com> a =E9crit:
> There are many many things which are allowed by the (context-free)
> grammar used by the parser that are later rejected by the
> semantic analyser - generic packages for one as you have
> already discovered.
Uh-oh, this seems to mean there is really no-no support for generics.  =

Unlike what I have believed I have read...


-- =

There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check.