From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,47fc49812a5e8e38 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: small example, using complex variables in Ada Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:15:37 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: <82ljannyeq.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: K7zEbuAt/3320lGJK9pCRA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12585 Date: 2010-06-10T23:15:37+02:00 List-Id: Le Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:27:38 +0200, J-P. Rosen a =E9cr= it: > For output, rounding is specified in the standard. And BTW, the standa= rd > does not specify IEEE (fortunately, it did not make the same mistake a= s > Java!). Which mistake ? (not to disagree, just to understand) -- = There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; --# assert Ada; -- i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion -- and start with new conclusion as premise.