From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,48e1a3c594fb62e8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPARK Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 21:12:20 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: sTlYSXnTcjJGTYbLtvdIYA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11643 Date: 2010-05-15T21:12:20+02:00 List-Id: > This isn't valid for all values of A, B and C: consider C = -1. It > would be sufficient to know 0 < C, so perhaps sufficient information > needs to be propagated to show 0 < Whole ? > > Phil C. Yes, you are right, that's why I had previously apologized for this error and corrected it in a reply to the erroneous message. Your exercises are interesting BTW. -- There is even better than a pragma Assert: an --# assert