From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,48e1a3c594fb62e8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPARK Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:00:10 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: sTlYSXnTcjJGTYbLtvdIYA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11638 Date: 2010-05-15T20:00:10+02:00 List-Id: > It was not able to prove it. Do I miss something or does it simply means > the simplifier does not know about a rule which seems basic to me, that > is (A <= B) -> ((A / C) <= (B / C)) ? ... which is still valid for > integer arithmetic. Sorry for a mistake, it should have been ((A <= B) and (A >= 0) and (C > 0)) -> ((A / C) <= (B / C)), to keep it simple and just to talk about what's relevant here. -- There is even better than a pragma Assert: an --# assert