From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,48e1a3c594fb62e8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPARK Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 03:20:03 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: mM0xwQlPwUIg+JKBHOmqjw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11594 Date: 2010-05-14T03:20:03+02:00 List-Id: Hello, once again playing with checker and examiner, Within all the documentations installed with SPARK, there are some named= = SPARK_QRGn.pdf. The one SPARK_QRG1.pdf contains a summary of annotations= = to be used with the language. I wonder if this document is part of the language definition or, if not,= = if I'm missing some documentations somewhere. The reason of this doubt is, an example, the =E2=80=9C--# assert ... ;=E2= =80=9D annotation = which is documented in SPARK_QRG1, and in no other documentation I've = read. I did not read all deeply at the time, and just had an overview of= = some. Anyway, I searched the =E2=80=9CExaminer_UM.pdf=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9C= SPARK95.pdf=E2=80=9D among others = for =E2=80=9C# assert=E2=80=9D in the text, and did not found any occurr= ence. I can see it = only in =E2=80=9CSPARK_QRG1.pdf=E2=80=9D. Is this file part of the language definition or did I missed some releva= nt = documentation elsewhere ? -- = pragma Asset ? Is that true ? Waaww... great