From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,48e1a3c594fb62e8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPARK Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 02:52:07 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: FD8vExnEy5iRSNWAUP6U/Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11575 Date: 2010-05-13T02:52:07+02:00 List-Id: Le Thu, 13 May 2010 00:55:02 +0200, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) = a =C3=A9crit: > Hope this first question will get a short answer, so let us jump to th= e = > second question, which is intended to start with one major deal of SPA= RK = > for people who know/use Ada : Ada subset and restrictions (not to = > disclaim or disagree with, mostly to talk and understand more). An important quote every one should know about ; especially the last = sentence: [Praxis SPARK 95 (5)] > Some readers may be dismayed to see so many features of Ada removed, > and feel that SPARK is =E2=80=9Ctoo small=E2=80=9D. It is by no means = the largest > subset of Ada which would be amenable to analysis by the techniques > employed in SPADE, but it is significantly larger than SPADE-Pascal, > which has been found adequate for a substantial number of > safety-critical projects. The additional features which appear in > SPARK (such as packages and private types) make programming simpler > and safer, rather than complicate the verification task. Of course, > the extent to which Ada must be simplified for high-integrity > programming will be a matter of opinion: our preoccupation with > simplicity is based on experience of what can be achieved with a > high degree of confidence in practice, rather than what can be > proved in principle. -- = pragma Asset ? Is that true ? Waaww... great