From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,23c0de5a42cf667e
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT packages in Linux distributions
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:17:46 +0200
Organization: Ada At Home
Message-ID: <op.vcif7wbtxmjfy8@garhos>
References: <j5e1x31qvn1b$.11ywrjmshtauz$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <87mxw9x7no.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <t8liq7w6ffnm$.19yq5hkq6tdto$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vcgi9oqzule2fv@garhos>
 <w1q9e75h9kzi.4p81vh3kannn$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vch6dsqmxmjfy8@garhos>
 <87fx1zwjyn.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ra5wLii/U0tbQP170oFAeA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11475
Date: 2010-05-11T00:17:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Mon, 10 May 2010 23:00:32 +0200, Ludovic Brenta  =

<ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> a =E9crit:
> So close, in fact, that the pre-, postconditions and invariants are
> already supported in GCC 4.4 (and therefore Debian) as
> implementation-defined pragmas:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.4/gnat_rm/Pragma-Precondition.ht=
ml
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.4/gnat_rm/Pragma-Postcondition.h=
tml
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.4/gnat_rm/Pragma-Assert.html
Lot of thanks for the news. So I have to guess MinGW (what I actually us=
e)  =

is a bit more outdated than GCC is. However, I will check if ever I miss=
ed  =

a recent update.

Nice point indeed

-- =

No-no, this isn't an oops ...or I hope (TM) - Don't blame me... I'm just=
  =

not lucky