From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c24fe1881cffabeb,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Yannick_Duch=EAne_=28Hibou57=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Why is not Stream_Access defined Ada.Streams ? Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 03:02:16 +0200 Organization: Ada At Home Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: zyzSZwtN8q0JtliBrX7N5w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11348 Date: 2010-05-07T03:02:16+02:00 List-Id: Hi all and Hi others as well, My dirty stuff of the day : why is Stream_Access not defined once a time in Ada.Streams and is instead defined elsewhere multiple times, like in Ada.Streams.Stream_IO, Ada.Text_IO.Text_Streams, Ada.Wide_Text_IO.Text_Streams and Ada.Wide_Wide_Text_IO.Text_Streams ? Isn't it funny design ? -- No-no, this isn't an oops ...or I hope (TM) - Don't blame me... I'm just not lucky