From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c39ad3e35a7690a9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr9816795pbv.7.1329141668589;
        Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni20226pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Convention for naming of packages
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:01:07 +0100
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.v9mej5bwule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: <op.v9fjran9ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jh1ef7$26qm$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <4f355230$0$21451$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <jh4ev3$h3l$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <jh95ba$go0$1@dont-email.me> <op.v9k356ipule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <1sx3fy79wys5s.1723nejowbg76.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9l06jxiule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <15fgcngmgl41e$.113i7gtuwpwpv$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <op.v9l8ump4ule2fv@douda-yannick> <op.v9macrjaule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <c4yt2w9j0czc$.qsdtialfkbum$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: TqfFTdzi95I8zBbbKWTz3Q.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2012-02-13T15:01:07+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:07:51 +0100, Dmitry A. Kazakov  =

<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a =C3=A9crit:
>> Before I forget this question: in a similar manner, I am seeking for =
a
>> generic name for procedure or function, when the main purpose of a  =

>> package
>> is a procedure or function. I though Apply and Eval or Get of Value  =

>> could
>> be option (Value being my current favorite for pure functions), but I=
'm
>> not clearly fine with any one of these.
>
> These are the result of Ada lacking means to declare user-defined
> dereference/delegation operations. I know no good schema for naming  =

> these.
It may don't hurt to give examples if you tried some.

> Ada 2012 might show itself better in that respect eliminating need in
> explicit naming of some of such operations.
I don't see. What do you mean, concretely?


-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers=
ity