From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a27bd01ed18da21f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.68.238.198 with SMTP id vm6mr15971113pbc.3.1328677510067; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:05:10 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni273005pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada compiler using a M2 compiler as back-end Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:05:08 +0100 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: Nct6a+O2WWeAxakAlXSC1w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2012-02-08T06:05:08+01:00 List-Id: Le Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:29:23 +0100, Gautier write-only = a =C3=A9crit: > Hi, > Just saw that a Modula-2 compiler (Stony Brook) has been recently > released as freeware: > > http://modula2.org/adwm2/ > I wondered why Modula=E2=80=912 instead of Modula=E2=80=913. A quick sea= rch on the web = suggest Modula=E2=80=913 was not widely adopted as an industry standard.= Does that = mean Modula=E2=80=912 is really widely adopted ? -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [1] [1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univers= ity