From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Beside of SPARK: how do you compare Alt-Ergo and Coq?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:24:48 +0100
Date: 2012-02-21T04:24:48+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.v90efmcbule2fv@douda-yannick> (raw)
If I'm wrong with this question here, just tell me. Many people here have
a lot of interest in such topics, and I though this may be another (again)
opportunity to link both to Ada. At least AdaCore already did with
Alt-Ergo which can be used as a prover in conjunction with SPARK. I know
the Alt-Ergo system was proved with Coq. Both Alt-Ergo and Coq are prover
or proof checker, but how do you compare both? I know Coq uses
intuitionistic logic. What about Alt-Ergo? Intuitionistic too? Now
Alt-Ergo is already used with SPARK/Ada. Coq too? These are the main
questions I have in mind.
Any pointers welcome. I've not used any of these so far, just planning to
learn one a bit (but not both). I am not necessarily seeking for
automatically generated Verification Condition from Ada.
--
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-21 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-21 3:24 Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2012-02-21 15:57 ` Beside of SPARK: how do you compare Alt-Ergo and Coq? Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-21 22:10 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-23 19:08 ` Phil Clayton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox