comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Beside of SPARK: how do you compare Alt-Ergo and Coq?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:24:48 +0100
Date: 2012-02-21T04:24:48+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.v90efmcbule2fv@douda-yannick> (raw)

If I'm wrong with this question here, just tell me. Many people here have  
a lot of interest in such topics, and I though this may be another (again)  
opportunity to link both to Ada. At least AdaCore already did with  
Alt-Ergo which can be used as a prover in conjunction with SPARK. I know  
the Alt-Ergo system was proved with Coq. Both Alt-Ergo and Coq are prover  
or proof checker, but how do you compare both? I know Coq uses  
intuitionistic logic. What about Alt-Ergo? Intuitionistic too? Now  
Alt-Ergo is already used with SPARK/Ada. Coq too? These are the main  
questions I have in mind.

Any pointers welcome. I've not used any of these so far, just planning to  
learn one a bit (but not both). I am not necessarily seeking for  
automatically generated Verification Condition from Ada.

-- 
“Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1]
“Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1]
[1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University



             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-21  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-21  3:24 Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) [this message]
2012-02-21 15:57 ` Beside of SPARK: how do you compare Alt-Ergo and Coq? Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-21 22:10 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-23 19:08 ` Phil Clayton
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox