From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_LOCAL_HEX,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a65bb7bde679ed1d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.36.6 with SMTP id m6mr5454127pbj.4.1322782057596;
        Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni54371pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776eeb@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ann: Natools.Chunked_Strings, beta 1
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:26:29 +0100
Message-ID: <op.v5t3efz4lzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <slrnjd9tpk.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <4ed4fc37$0$2537$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
 <op.v5q874xcule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <ouubrb3trn06$.1jl5q3ausoy2v.dlg@40tude.net>
 <jb6gn0$47g$1@munin.nbi.dk> <de6vkicxgv4x$.1c89iragml7xf$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net 8ZZNb0C7ecIcZUfwB3v0fgBeO1podOAPjVBYUmBz+S6Y+mNB4m
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ay6vjTQFNghQ41zrqtVp/jXjEAA=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.52 (Win32)
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19297
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-12-02T00:26:29+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> This is very likely. But my concern was not performance, rather the idea of
> having long strings. Since long text strings do not exist in "nature"
> (:-)), nobody should like to have them.

Hmm. What's the average length of a DNA-string? ;)


Vinzent.

-- 
f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.