From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9544fb5ce0a6df8b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr22017810pbr.6.1322427039358;
        Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni25421pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.tornevall.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Overloading attributes
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:50:38 +0100
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.v5mhioiaule2fv@douda-yannick>
References: <8ed87fee-166a-4be9-ae6c-4d0fbeb4788c@s6g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jasb8q$sgv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jasnea$ac1$1@dont-email.me>
 <jau4t6$7ms$1@speranza.aioe.org> <op.v5mgr4x1ule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: B0fj88Qo5RPyajGtdWC/cQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.60 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19202
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2011-11-27T21:50:38+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:34:42 +0100, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57)  =

<yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> a =C3=A9crit:
> So you can forget about user defined attributes, unless you can quote =
 =

> the RM where it =E2=80=9Cexplicitly permit=E2=80=9D user defined attri=
butes. At least,  =

> user defined attributes does not fall in the =E2=80=9Cimpossible or im=
practical  =

> to avoid=E2=80=9D case.
Well, I found it for you: a sentence at same place where implementation =
 =

defined pragma are explicitly allowed.

> 1.1.3 Conformity of an Implementation with the Standard
> [=E2=80=A6]
> 17 An implementation conforming to this International Standard may  =

> provideadditional attributes, library units, and pragmas.
Still does not talk about user defined attributes. Deducing =E2=80=9Call=
ow user  =

defined attributes=E2=80=9D from =E2=80=9Callow implementation defined a=
ttributes=E2=80=9D, seems  =

dubious.

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
[1]: [Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Univer=
sity]