From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,73175d2d01a1b1dd
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr7145003pba.0.1317742886423;
        Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 lh7ni11411pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: subprogram must not be deeper than access type
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:41:24 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.v2t27abqule2fv@index.ici>
References: <slrnj7trhq.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <818752663338654817.822041rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <slrnj80ieh.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <wccmxdr772s.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <15r7hdzgyr0fc.1djn7vwy23dfg$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wccehz3jn48.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1uqthqxzri6j3.i18ifhbwmzdc.dlg@40tude.net> <j5ro7t$dji$1@dont-email.me>
 <10bj41auuxi17$.42qw3wdubqn3.dlg@40tude.net> <op.v2s7xnseule2fv@index.ici>
 <gk6gupu4gbie.1feok3e8ay6ot$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7l1g1PpQtKdmCiXJ1feKqw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.51 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18293
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2011-10-04T17:41:24+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:58:21 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov  =

<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a =C3=A9crit:
> BTW, the list of parameters of a subprogram is an anonymous record typ=
e,
> but Ada does not require its explicit declaration, e.g.
I use to think the same too. Agree this would be more clean. The same  =

could be with result returned from functions too. I also guess if Ada di=
d  =

such a different thing, people would run away from Ada even faster than =
 =

they actually do.

I don't believe such points, although clever, should be expected to be  =

part of future Ada revision, but preferably part of a potential Ada  =

successor.

What a pity there is no repository for this kind of ideas. It's all lost=
  =

scattered every where in this Usenet.


-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D  [Ep=
igrams on  =

Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [Idem]
Java: Write once, Never revisit