From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,73175d2d01a1b1dd
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.38.134 with SMTP id g6mr4956640pbk.6.1317702922942;
        Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 lh7ni11036pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: subprogram must not be deeper than access type
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 06:35:21 +0200
Organization: Ada @ Home
Message-ID: <op.v2s8c7xlule2fv@index.ici>
References: <slrnj7trhq.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <818752663338654817.822041rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
 <slrnj80ieh.i18.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
 <4e808c5b$0$6622$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: wc8b5Gz2brMDJGVD+LmnUQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.51 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18289
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 2011-10-04T06:35:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:29:47 +0200, Georg Bauhaus  =

<rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> a =C3=A9crit:

> On 26.09.11 11:45, Natasha Kerensikova wrote:
>
>>> Also, whenever an anonymous type
>>> seems to solve a design problem,
>>> something might be in bad shape
>>> at a higher level.
>>
>> Actually I wonder whether there is a design problem at all.
>
> Just a design choice.
>
> In general, I should think that if an author too quickly arrives
> at pointers, some C heritage shows. I can really picture the
> structs and function pointers, I think :-)
That's where some functional programing background can make a difference=
  =

;-) (with apologizes to Dmitry)

-- =

=E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D  [Ep=
igrams on  =

Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University]
=E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [Idem]
Java: Write once, Never revisit