From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2b519fb2d20e8d1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.68.50.133 with SMTP id c5mr52014211pbo.2.1317478730625; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Path: lh7ni9100pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Current statu of ASIS for GNAT 2012, please ? Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:17:28 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: <87sjngwoo6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lit7x2xu.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4fade922-81df-4480-83b1-d8025075306b@dm9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <877h4puldk.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 0rVUtFTd7Kj7ebR/QSEFRg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.51 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: 2011-10-01T16:17:28+02:00 List-Id: Le Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:11:35 +0200, Ludovic Brenta = a =C3=A9crit: > Again, why do you keep trying to find other, more difficult solutions = to > your problem? I may have to give a summary of the history so far: as pointed in this = thread, every thing was fine, except for AUnit, which could be compiled,= = but which gave me errors as soon as I wanted to build an AUnit = application. I did not want a more difficult solution, I just wanted AUn= it = working. I tried, as you suggested, to install a Debian Sid within a chroot = environement, which was not better: there is either libaunit3, which doe= s = not come with required AUnit files such as aunit.gpr, or either = libaunit1-dev, which provides a aunit.gpr among others required files, b= ut = which unfortunately depends on GNAT 4.4... and bahm, conflict. As this thread seems to drive you a bit nervous (a guess from your = wordings), I will not tell more here, about future evolution of the stor= y, = to help keep the climate here, peaceful. Except just a last side note: I've submitted today a bug report to Debia= n, = about some wrong things with a GCC source package from Debian Testing. I= = straight away get a reply asserting I did not applied the required patch= es = (but I did), and the report was invalidated (did they really tested ?). = = Interestingly, a similar report was submitted to FSF too, by someone els= e, = few months ago, the exact same. Was rejected too and not taken into = account for some other excuses (that's probably why the bug is still the= re = months after), pretending the bug does not exist (while multiple people = on = the web have testified of the same bug). If really the Open Source world= = want people to submit bug reports, one good idea may be to acknowledge b= ug = reports, may be as long time pending bug if there is no other way. Alway= s = the same stories, either excuses to not take the bug into account, eithe= r = excuse like "it's not a bug, it's a feature", and so on. Finished with b= ug = reports for me. As that seems to serve nothing in any places, I will not= = bother any more now. Just saying this here as I know you are a Debian = maintainer, if ever that can help you and your colleagues understand why= = many people don't bother submitting bug reports. -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [Ep= igrams on = Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [Idem] Java: Write once, Never revisit