From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,18fc2b6ba41ed2a6 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Yannick_Duch=C3=AAne_=28Hibou57?= =?utf-8?Q?=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and Exuberant CTags Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:23:00 +0200 Organization: Ada @ Home Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 5i9r7jT2sUed7HIYw2RKEw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.51 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21384 Date: 2011-10-12T05:23:00+02:00 List-Id: Le Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:21 +0200, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) = a =C3=A9crit: > Le Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:44:37 +0200, R. Tyler Croy a = = > =C3=A9crit: >>>> > What specification or reference did you used for Ada tag kinds code ? As a quick overview. I understood you used something originally made for= = VIM: http://gnuada.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gnuada/tags/ctags-ada-mode-4.3.= 11/ada.c?revision=3D977&view=3Dmarkup This use the exact same tag kinds as yours But the reference says: http://ctags.sourceforge.net/FORMAT > Note that these are mostly for C and C++. Whentags programs are writt= en = > for other languages,this list should be extended to include the used = > field names. *should be extended* This is very important to underline. Here, the ctag= s = for Ada used by VIM happily overwrite every thing. They did not follow t= he = CTags reference. Interestingly, I could find some one else, who tried to follow the CTags= = standard, and cleanly mapped Ada semantic to these, without any dangerou= s = overwriting: http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/Ada/comp.lang.ada/2004-08/0108.html To come back to a previous example, he, used 'f' for function and = procedure. That's a mess, there seems to be no respect for standard at all. Famous = = people don't follow the standard, and the one who followed the standard,= = is an unknown guy and has probably no influence. -- = =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [Ep= igrams on = Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale University] =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.= =E2=80=9D [Idem] Java: Write once, Never revisit