From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c193e01cab96e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:33:24 +0100 Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system From: "Martin Krischik" Organization: Martin Krischik, Softwareentwicklung Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <74c40d98-9150-4e5e-aab0-b0b28145cb0d@a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.63 (MacIntel) NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.236.172.92 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=c_M@J0@61GG8R0D Am 09.03.2009, 17:02 Uhr, schrieb : > On Mar 7, 7:23 am, "abcd" wrote: >> why ada is better of "C" language for embeded system? > You can seee the results of completion rates for a 10-15K line project > done in both C and Ada in my Real-Time Embedded Systems class over the > past 20 years. The class runs for one semester (15 weeks). The > bottom line is that NO student team ever completed the minimal project > requirements in C. Over 80% of the teams working in Ada complted the > project. My latest publications on the matter are Interesting - where the studens alowed to choose the language or was it forced upon them? Do the students know before hand of the dire C results? Martin -- Martin Krischik