From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b7f354b77ed4878c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!130.81.64.211.MISMATCH!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny05.POSTED!c2bfcbcf!not-for-mail Subject: Re: runtime systems From: "Ed Falis" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <5b8b9ed2-e03b-4f97-8666-9a11a5450a32@w74g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.27 (Linux) Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 16:44:37 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.184.110.64 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny05 1209919477 71.184.110.64 (Sun, 04 May 2008 12:44:37 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 12:44:37 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21183 Date: 2008-05-04T16:44:37+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 03 May 2008 22:51:42 -0400, Lucretia wrote: > I don't think it'd be possible to move an Ada runtime from 1 compiler > to another without porting it properly as the compilers create code > that references the runtime in compiler-specific ways. I presented a paper at SigAda '82 on a portable run-time library interface based on my post-grad work of the time. Boy, that sure went over big ;-)