From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
 function
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:00:45 +0100
Organization: At Home
Message-ID: <op.u740rjfxvwnd5a@garhos>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <41b794ec-26b0-485e-a959-580a5b877a3b@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <8e09c20d-172e-42a2-b2ff-994863893523@h12g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <wcczl3fgxum.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <ff4735cf-c7d7-420d-b17d-a53576e8a5d5@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <wccocju1o56.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <jk97b2c81itt$.1h9s6uejsnxcu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wcczl3drv31.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1js6r6txuzjqz$.uah5yuqtg8md$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kQMverxwaeU3xzceVSz2QA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Win32)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9218
Date: 2010-02-14T23:00:45+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:59:44 +0100, Dmitry A. Kazakov  =

<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> a =E9crit:
>>> Nope, the mathematical notation for a tuple is as in Ada (a,b,c,...)=
,  =

>>> so
>>> should it be.
>>
>> Well, none of the following Ada operators use the standard maths
>> notation:
>>
>>     -  *  /  **  <=3D  >=3D  /=3D  and  or  not
>
> Hey, somebody pushed for Unicode in Ada2005. Isn't it time now to fix =
 =

> that?
> (:-))
I use to think about this one , using the Unicode characters standing fo=
r  =

this kind of relationship operator and others, but this would not work  =

anyway in some editor/IDE, like GPS, and the ones looking like ASCII Art=
  =

(the actual ones), are easier to input.

-- =

No-no, this isn't an oops ...or I hope (TM) - Don't blame me... I'm just=
  =

not lucky