From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8dabd6d669ed7263 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny04.POSTED!c2bfcbcf!not-for-mail Subject: Re: Moving From AUnit V1 to V2 From: "Ed Falis" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <9f4fd5a5-9940-481d-850d-bdd24821781e@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.26 (Win32) X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080316-0, 03/16/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:41:57 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.184.110.64 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny04 1205710917 71.184.110.64 (Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:41:57 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:41:57 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20440 X-Original-Bytes: 1661 Date: 2008-03-16T23:41:57+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:44:39 -0400, Simon Wright wrote: > I didn't have any GNAT-GPL-2007 problems with AUnit 1.05 (which came > with 2006). > > I hadn't (therefore) checked out AUnit 2 - but I see that AUnit 2.01 > includes notes on migrating from 1 to 2, and even a script to automate > some of the changes. Are these notes wrong? Yes, AUnit 1.05 is fine for use within AUnit's original design parameters. AUnit 2.xx was intended to address usage under constrained run-time environments, for example no exception propagation or dynamic allocation. This change required a certain amount of interface change, though we tried to limit it insofar as possible.