From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Subtypes and type invariants in Ada2012 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:10:13 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:05:57 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7edc9f692df7c7dfc0a7fae70ced8680"; logging-data="28073"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ScdAsKq193SwNF/3P8n8O" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: fr Cancel-Lock: sha1:NX4i4LBSAg1ofqvY6a7sE1PJdTg= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47767 Date: 2017-08-21T18:10:13+02:00 List-Id: Le 21/08/2017 à 17:38, Victor Porton a écrit : > I thought that type invariants are designed for subtypes. I mistook! > [...] > So, my question: Is it possible to restrict a subtype with something like a > type invariant? > > I want a subtype restricted by an arbitrary condition. Is it possible? > This is rather a subtype predicate. Type invariants are here to publicize properties of a private type, otherwise the user knows nothing about it (since it is private!) -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr