From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!franka.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED.rrsoftware.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Community Input for the Maintenance and Revision of the Ada
 Programming Language
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:51:57 -0500
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <oml5de$pua$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <oludae$seh$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <79e06550-67d7-45b3-88f8-b7b3980ecb20@googlegroups.com>
 <9d4bc8aa-cc44-4c30-8385-af0d29d49b36@googlegroups.com>
 <1395655516.524005222.638450.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <1502382504.2184.6.camel@obry.net> <omi2vs$12q7$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <1040032843.524077622.950797.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <omi4tu$1647$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <183e2377-26b9-436f-830f-ba2021d455f6@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:51:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: franka.jacob-sparre.dk;
 posting-host="rrsoftware.com:24.196.82.226";
	logging-data="26570"; mail-complaints-to="news@jacob-sparre.dk"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.7246
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47714
Date: 2017-08-11T15:51:57-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Lucretia" <laguest9000@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:183e2377-26b9-436f-830f-ba2021d455f6@googlegroups.com...
> On Thursday, 10 August 2017 18:25:30 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov  wrote:
>
>> >> Should not they be named? Then it is an anonymous record type:
>> >>
>> >>     function Blah return
>> >>        record Count : Integer; Value : Float end record;
>
> No, I would prefer notation for tuples, say <> or [] as they have no
>use in Ada, or just use () like we do for everything else. In the
>compiler, it could just generate records.

What problem does this solve better than just declaring a Tuple record type? 
Anonymous types are evil.

                                             Randy.