From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Convert an access to constant to access to variable
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 01:17:08 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <om2rph$18jt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: qrWnZLr+FAc2xoElQM2hng.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47589
Date: 2017-08-05T01:17:08+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

What is the proper way to convert an access to constant to access to 
variable? (Yes, I know that then I need to be careful not to modify this 
"variable".)

Maybe Unchecked_Conversion?

But:

1. Is Unchecked_Conversion guaranteed by the standard to work well in this 
case?

2. Is there a simpler way than Unchecked_Conversion?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org