From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.freedyn.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: HTTP with Simple Components: Status.Kind always File Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 22:57:35 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <2017071720305687401-contact@flyx.org> <2017071918093536089-contact@flyx.org> <2017071923134489971-contact@flyx.org> <2017072015354641511-contact@flyx.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: MajGvm9MbNtGBKE7r8NgYA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 Content-Language: en-US X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47478 Date: 2017-07-20T22:57:35+02:00 List-Id: On 2017-07-20 22:29, Simon Wright wrote: > Felix Krause writes: > >> Now, my problem is that this argument is quite far away from >> reality. I tested various HTTP client >> implementations (curl, Chrome, Firefox), and every one, when I tell it to get >> >> http://example.com/?key=value >> >> sends the following Request-Line: >> >> GET /?key=value HTTP/1.1 >> >> So, HTTP clients do not seem to respect this part of the HTTP >> specification. > > The RFC that Dmitri quotes is for URIs. You want the one that defines > the HTTP protocol, currently RFC7230 - see section 3, Message Format. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3 So, is it OK to always recognize query part in the path. Correct? What is the scheme by default? http? None? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de