From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Help needed - "Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory
 access"
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <oi64e9$mji$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5a0d60e6-c713-4a83-8c98-81a2af68e75e@googlegroups.com>
 <oi5ldc$d9t$1@dont-email.me>
 <93822692-767f-4546-8e39-9c4b7ceab3e6@googlegroups.com>
 <291a8209-d893-4822-896d-32727d5c9509@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="a9b5b489f97510589e6819cea1b9ebdf";
	logging-data="23154"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4KKt4cEif3uZw0OGpKSXgrR+tBJnMrE4="
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1Jqtjeb++jn1mAB5+Nysv2cs15E=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46986
Date: 2017-06-18T14:58:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2017-06-18, Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 2:01:01 PM UTC+2, reinert wrote:
>> Here below are results from "ulimit -a" for both computers:
>> 
>> On the (problematic) "stretch computer":
>> 
>> open files                      (-n) 1024
>> 
>> On the "jessie" computer (where tings works):
>> 
>> open files                      (-n) 65536
>
> I guess this is your culprit
>

I would have personally expected to see a different error message if
the process ran out of available channels, however it is certainly
worth trying to increase the limit to see if it fixes the problem.

We can also see from the ulimit output that there is no specific
stack limit set.

To the OP, can you post the section of code this is failing on and
then identify which line in that specific section of code is line 268 ?

Does changing (for example) the optimisation options cause the failing
line number to change ?

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world