From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-21 18:23:34 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Operating System
Date: 21 Feb 2002 20:23:31 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <ohB3o9FfeYQc@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <a4u9d00vqe@enews2.newsguy.com>
 <5Tzc8.111999$H37.15018616@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <slrna75lja.g7h.hugues@neraka.rezel.enst.fr> <a4uqu402315@enews2.newsguy.com>
 <ee19489.0202200647.3a45bc32@posting.google.com> <3C73F480.5010806@mail.com>
 <a533vq$sts$1@knossos.btinternet.com> <$D13NMeU$AWl@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <a543mf$s4e$1@paris.btinternet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1014344613 21393 192.135.80.34 (22 Feb 2002
 02:23:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 02:23:33 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20242
Date: 2002-02-21T20:23:31-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <a543mf$s4e$1@paris.btinternet.com>, "tony gair" <tonygair@nounsolitations.btinternet.com> writes:
> 
> "Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote in message
> news:$D13NMeU$AWl@eisner.encompasserve.org...
>> In article <a533vq$sts$1@knossos.btinternet.com>, "tony gair"
> <tonygair@nounsolitations.btinternet.com> writes:
>>
>> > PS you could also say there would be a lot more innocent civilians
> around
>> > without
>> > Ada or C++ supported weapon systems.
>>
>> I am not convinced that ill-controlled explosives are better than
>> well-controlled explosives.  Plenty of explosive were used in the
>> US Civil War (1861-1865) -- as much as possible, despite the lack
>> of fine-grained control mechanisms.
> 
> They may be well controlled by the software, but they are certainly ill
> controlled
> by vicous vile, cowards. Come the world wide revolution they will each be
> tied in a chair and forced to watch a looped tape of an episode of Dallas,
> for the rest of their lives...........

I gather you live in a backward country that does not yet have
broadcasts of Jenny Jones, Sally Jessy Raphael and Jerry Springer :-)