From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a585ebe495b2eeaf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-24 19:12:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc02.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Steve" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: create comp.lang.ada.spark - thoughts? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.211.13.75 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc02 1043464340 12.211.13.75 (Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:12:20 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:12:20 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:12:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33418 Date: 2003-01-25T03:12:20+00:00 List-Id: "Rod Chapman" wrote in message news:cf2c6063.0301240322.652bc828@posting.google.com... > Dear c.l.a > > We are considering submitting a Request for Disscussion (RFD) to > create a new newsgroup: comp.lang.ada.spark > > This would be an unmoderated group for general discussion of the SPARK > Ada subset and its uses. In order for an RFD to be successful there has > to be a general critical-mass of interest (and votes!) to make it > worth-while... > > So...what do you think? Good idea? Bad idea? Don't care? Personally I'd like to see information about SPARK on cla. I would however like to see separate: comp.lang.ada.advocacy and comp.lang.ada.off-topic newsgroups. Maybe we could even get Robert Dewar back on cla ;-) > > Thanks, > Rod Chapman, SPARK Team