From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Preventing private procedure visibility being made public through
 extension
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 00:58:21 +0200
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <ogabnv$9hj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bd5b3107-709d-46b9-b29b-fd15e8a6e265@googlegroups.com>
 <ofq943$14v4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <4a47e4cd-829c-4451-abf1-82cf60b67706@googlegroups.com>
 <ofrk18$s6f$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <9cdf04e6-123e-4bd9-b466-77aad00d61bb@googlegroups.com>
 <ofvkhq$2vq$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <e9d5050e-1046-4f8a-92e0-feded33f7a50@googlegroups.com>
 <og7bug$9lq$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <62e326e6-dd15-4546-83dc-b1e423327c23@googlegroups.com>
 <oga47i$dvr$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 22:54:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="c11c97550ffb44c16cd93a32998f9033";
	logging-data="9779"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19V4DblgBc+5UkXxHt3cXA85xXGZiSIzz0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To: <oga47i$dvr$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fT2f+PfwbRx0CurxGXvY6iWu9vY=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46870
Date: 2017-05-27T00:58:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 05/26/2017 10:46 PM, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> Ah, a subtype. GNAT has (or had?)a bug having to do with making things
> visible because of a subtype declaration (I recall someone else running
> across that and having verified it myself). That's just plain wrong, a
> subtype has no effect on what's visible in a prefixed call (or anywhere else
> for that matter, in particular with "use all type").

That was me. I wasn't aware that you had verified it as a compiler error.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!"
Monty Python's Flying Circus
22